Addressivity and the Monument Memorials, Publics and the Yezidis of Armenia - Christine Allison

- Nietzsche's "monumental history" criticism: Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life, trans. Peter Preuss (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980), 16.

- Pierre Nora's history vs memory opposition + the critic of it: 5“Collapse the Nature-Culture distinction, as postmodernist criticism has done in various ways, and both memory and history look like heavily constructed narratives, with only institutionally regulated differences between them.” Natalie Zemon Davis and Randolph Starn, “Introduction,” Representations, no. 26 (1989):2.

- James Young "counter-monuments"+ "And as Young states, one of the aims behind the erection of
monuments by governments is the fostering of an illusion that the public
is uniform and that a common memory exists, and that values and ideals
are shared by the entire community."

-"Examples from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union suggest
that whatever the intentions of governments that erected them, monuments
are especially vulnerable to reinterpretation and reconfiguration."--- (Bellantani&Panico'nun örnek alanı)

- Conceptual Framework: Karin Barber’s work on texts and on how texts form publics. >> Bakhtinian notion of addressivity

- Margaret Mills’s discussion of the oral historian Alessandro Portelli’s work

- Bakhtinian “utterance" (seems like Althusserian interpellation?)

Comments

Popular Posts